Search results

Did you even read the rest of the paragraph you responded to, which explains how this would not be permitted? If you're arguing that it's too broad, as your original argument seemed to imply, you should be able to give one example of when those acts wouldn't be genocide. If you're arguing that...

Glad people are at least honest at why all the votes are suddenly coming in at the last minute! Edit: Preserving in case it gets removed,

It does not do this. It says that Section 2 "does not prohibit" them, not that they are absolutely unrestricted under Section 2 in all forms. If some company is hiring only, say, white people who speak English for a position where only the latter is an actual necessity, the discrimination...

I was referring less to your post specifically than to the sudden flood of Against votes as soon as the resolution hits vote. I don't understand this point. Taking intelligence into account in such a situation would not violate the resolution ipso facto. However, applying an interpretation of...

Is there a reason all this opposition is suddenly coming up in the last minute, as opposed to before it actually hit vote? I still don't think this is true. An employer could indeed claim that they are discriminating based on intelligence, but that doesn't change the core fact that they are --...

This was not why it was withdrawn; rather that was private comments on the proposal from Coporiana.

For (non-WA).

Given that I was appointed despite explicitly declining the position privately, I would like to enter my resignation as Deputy Minister into the public record.

For the record, I had removed @nvxl from the Ministry towards the end of my service as Minister, due to their failure to respond to a roll call.

Quebecshire is certainly deserving and this does very well in explaining why. For (non-WA).

I literally, also, explicitly addressed the quoted post by IA gameside. Absolute for (non-WA),

Kenmoria literally started in the WA Discord that their quoted post was an IC comment made in "poor faith" by their IC Ambassador, and they had no OOC objections to that clause. Absolutely for (non-WA).

I'm a TNPer and my TNP nation is Magecastle Embassy Building A5.

This was the target of the raids. For (non-WA) specifically on the grounds of the quorum raids.

I'm not convinced by the other complaints raised here, and it's always good to see a new author drafting and submitting proposals. For (non-WA).

Yes, I was referring to the old version. Like the old version, this repeal still makes a number of quite exaggerated, misleading complaints. This is still just a more bloated way of repeating nonsense. That a trial is fair does not mean that requiring said trials to happen is "superfluous"...

Even if you don't like the WA police, we shouldn't encourage this sort of lying and bad faith in a repeal.

People shouldn't be punished for telling an agency something that's wrong in good faith. If the agency doesn't investigate properly and wrongly punishes someone, that's really the agency's fault. It makes absolutely no sense to punish a whistleblower because an agency doesn't properly...

The reason for this is that the proposal is at exactly 5000 characters and it would break the character limit to include a longer preamble :P. Edit: Regrettably, it appears it is only at 4996 characters...however the point still applies.

The very strange complaints about a "clique" aside (rhetoric I've primarily seen used by anti-GA trolls, such as LWU during the quorum raiding), nobody is claiming that Tinhampton does not write a lot of bad proposals -- I have certainly found myself opposing many of her proposals, for instance...

I don't think this is what the text of the target says, even if the author's intent is indeed this. The resolution says "A competent authority of a member state must define, if desired in writing by the said investor, to be [']sophisticated['] if that investor...". This does not require that...

For (non-WA). I do not disclaim bias as co-author here, but I'm not seeing a compelling reason that a 36x WA Author should not be C/C'ed.

I would be curious to hear the rationale for the unexplained opposition. While I cannot vote as my WA is not currently in TNP, I find myself increasingly agreeing with every one of these arguments each time I read the target. The target is indeed toothless apart from a singular provision which...

As this proposal has yet again been resubmitted, thread unlocked.

Accepted, you should receive a forum PM shortly.

Liberate Philippines was passed 11,112 votes to 1,796.

Apologies, but it appears I still do not have DM permissions in the Mowaa, nor the Deputy Minister forum role.

I, Magecastle, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Deputy Minister of World Assembly Affairs, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and...

Per this appointment and oath, I should be demasked as WAA Minister and @Simone given that masking instead. Edit: I should also be masked as a Deputy WAA Minister, as per here.

This roll call is closed. My thanks to everyone who replied here. Thread locked.