Search results

  1. nvxl

    [GA—AT VOTE—FOR] Repeal: "Standardized Passport Arrangements"

    Against Not particularly swayed by this argument alone given the standing conventions
  2. nvxl

    [GA—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Fair Pretrial Procedure

    Present No real specific issue with the text itself, but this seems a rather odd thing to have to codify into the WA
  3. nvxl

    [GA—IN QUEUE] Repeal: "Reducing Bycatch"

    Against I don't think those clauses were very good to begin with, because they're very vague and have little capacity for enforcement (and particularly so of impartiality). However, that's hardly worthy of repeal because the argument made here presumes that such "research" would inherently...
  4. nvxl

    [GA—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Prohibition On Coerced Testimony

    Present Not particularly opposed; just notes: clause 2c is quite hard to unambiguously parse; 3c questionable; and "courts of entities subject to member state jurisdiction" seems slightly confused and overreaching (perhaps "courts empowered by member states to [...]" was intended? "courts" is a...
  5. nvxl

    [GA—IN QUEUE] Repeal: "Civilian Air Compact"

    For Not a great repeal, but not a great resolution either. See you all at the next relitigation of this topic
  6. nvxl

    [GA—IN QUEUE] Obesity Awareness

    Apologies, it would have been prudent of me to check the actual submitted proposal, though my vote remains Against. The proposal still does very little.
  7. nvxl

    [GA—IN QUEUE] Obesity Awareness

    Against General drafting, plus a few parts really don't make much sense (eg. "while having a visible warning print on them" without further qualification). (also Tin got cut out of being co-author lol)
  8. nvxl

    [GA—UP NEXT—AGAINST] Airspace Sovereignty Doctrine

    Against I'll give up on commenting fully on these and just accept "capacity management" to mean anything. I still think the WA can (and should) effectively assert the jurisdiction of member nations' ANSPs over international airspace by compelling member nations to comply with centrally-defined...
  9. nvxl

    [GA—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Regulating Games Of Chance And Skill

    Against Pasted the wrong proposal in though
  10. nvxl

    [GA—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Civilian Air Compact

    Against Well-reasoned above, plus a lot of the clauses really make very little sense, and some are unimplementable. I do quite enjoy "thusly" though.
  11. nvxl

    [GA—WITHDRAWN] Regulating Games Of Chance And Skill

    Against I find "requires that games of chance clearly display to potential participants the odds of winning" to be highly unusual; I don't understand what is meant by "follow all rules/regulations that they choose to implement", since there is no requirement for such "rules/regulations" to be...
Back
Top