Search results

Against as it's an @Imperium Anglorum resolution and I generally oppose repeals of anyone who was previously in GenSec, and the fact that they intend to reboot the GA next year makes repeals moot.

I am not kidding

1712

No ayuzh?

I am always happy to be quoted in Greitbart :)

McMasterdonia's muffin explodes

296 cans of spam on the wall, 296 cans of spam! Take one down, pass it around, 295 cans of spam on the wall!

1679

1676

I decline my nomination, as explained in the TNP Discord Citizens Chat for IRL reasons. I don't mind running if there's three candidates but there's a good selection of candidates right now. If more candidates withdraw so it becomes an uncontested race I will enter to provide a choice, but not...

Full support

Against.

1640

Against, since a blocker can also be repealed fairly easily (depending on your point of view on blockers). Not mentioning recreational drugs in the annals of the GA has the same effect.

For

Aomori, Japan

1631

Justice: 1. < Lord Dominator > 2. < Vivanco > 3. < Gorundu > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

Full support.

1625

1621

319 cans of spam on the wall, 319 cans of spam! Take one down, pass it around, 318 cans of spam on the wall!

321 cans of spam on the wall, 321 cans of spam! Take one down, pass it around, 320 cans of spam on the wall!

Bar

EpiPen

I second @Orange, @Jinkies, @St George, @Vapia, @Kyle, @Polgaria, @Halsoni, and @Wymondham I also nominate the existing justices @Picairn and @Vivanco as well as @Attempted Socialism I pre-emptively decline any nominations of myself.

1610

329 cans of spam on the wall, 329 cans of spam! Take one down, pass it around, 328 cans of spam on the wall!

Yes. Yes. I assume Halsoni is drunk somewhere.

Ebb